<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CCF College | Damien Aragon | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.ccfcollege.com/members/damiendaragon-net/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ccfcollege.com/members/damiendaragon-net/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Damien Aragon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 01:44:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b10dab09a6a61ad16d20c1bbb82c3560</guid>
				<title>Damien Aragon started the topic Module 5, week 1, audio 2 in the forum Technical Support</title>
				<link>https://www.ccfcollege.com/forums/topic/module-5-week-1-audio-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 23:38:19 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
   The downloadable audio file for Module 5, week 1, audio 2 is the same as audio 1.  If you play from the webpage it is correct, but if you try and download it, it is the same as week 1.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Damien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">980462aae2bbc7c9ac9162150cc087b0</guid>
				<title>Damien Aragon started the topic Inerrancy / Infallibility in the forum Module 3 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://www.ccfcollege.com/forums/topic/inerrancy-infallibility/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:17:20 -0700</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[These were my comments from last Thursday 1/26/17]<br />
The context of my statements has nothing to do with speaking with unbelievers or baby Christians, I recognize speaking with them requires a different tact. You men that are in this room (learning the meat of the word) and these supposed “ministers/theologians” who should know better, but have bou&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-867"><a href="https://www.ccfcollege.com/forums/topic/inerrancy-infallibility/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">963c3f4aaa2daf518d31927d9f796d3f</guid>
				<title>Damien Aragon started the topic Inerrancy / Infallibility in the forum Module 3 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://www.ccfcollege.com/forums/topic/inerrancy-infallibility/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:17:20 -0700</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The context of my statements has nothing to do with speaking with unbelievers or baby Christians, I recognize speaking with them requires a different tact. You men that are in this room (learning the meat of the word) and these supposed “ministers/theologians” who should know better, but have bought the lie of Satan “has God indeed said?&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-866"><a href="https://www.ccfcollege.com/forums/topic/inerrancy-infallibility/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>